Builder Delivery Track Record
Based on Karnataka RERA Quarterly Progress Reports (QPR). Shows how many of each builder's RERA-registered projects have passed their proposed possession date.
Data source: Karnataka RERA portal — 44 builders, 300 projects with QPR data. Updated weekly.
| Builder | Total projects | QPR tracked | Past date | On track | Delay profile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prestige Group | 84 | 31 | 13 (42%) | 18 | 42% |
| Brigade Group | 54 | 25 | 9 (36%) | 16 | 36% |
| Sobha Limited | 46 | 18 | 5 (28%) | 13 | 28% |
| Adarsh Developers | 21 | 16 | 8 (50%) | 8 | 50% |
| Sattva Group | 30 | 16 | 3 (19%) | 13 | 19% |
| Puravankara Limited | 58 | 13 | 6 (46%) | 7 | 46% |
| Assetz Property Group | 38 | 13 | 6 (46%) | 7 | 46% |
| Shriram Properties | 34 | 13 | 6 (46%) | 7 | 46% |
| Godrej Properties | 46 | 13 | 3 (23%) | 10 | 23% |
| Sowparnika | 16 | 12 | 7 (58%) | 5 | 58% |
| Casagrand Builder | 17 | 11 | 2 (18%) | 9 | 18% |
| Embassy Group | 16 | 8 | 5 (63%) | 3 | 63% |
| SNN Builders | 11 | 7 | 2 (29%) | 5 | 29% |
| Abhee | 13 | 7 | 0 (0%) | 7 | 0% |
| Century Real Estate | 14 | 6 | 5 (83%) | 1 | 83% |
| Sumadhura Group | 9 | 6 | 2 (33%) | 4 | 33% |
| Mana Projects | 9 | 6 | 0 (0%) | 6 | 0% |
| Mantri Developers | 10 | 5 | 4 (80%) | 1 | 80% |
| Concorde Group | 12 | 5 | 1 (20%) | 4 | 20% |
| Orchid | 9 | 5 | 1 (20%) | 4 | 20% |
| NCC Urban | 9 | 4 | 2 (50%) | 2 | 50% |
| DNR Group | 8 | 4 | 2 (50%) | 2 | 50% |
| Birla Estates | 8 | 4 | 0 (0%) | 4 | 0% |
| Mahindra Lifespaces | 16 | 4 | 0 (0%) | 4 | 0% |
| SBR Group | 6 | 4 | 0 (0%) | 4 | 0% |
| Rohan Builders | 10 | 3 | 3 (100%) | 0 | 100% |
| Arvind | 5 | 3 | 2 (67%) | 1 | 67% |
| Lodha Group | 8 | 3 | 0 (0%) | 3 | 0% |
| Radiance | 6 | 3 | 0 (0%) | 3 | 0% |
| Aratt Builders | 6 | 3 | 0 (0%) | 3 | 0% |
| Nvt | 5 | 3 | 0 (0%) | 3 | 0% |
| Valmark | 4 | 2 | 2 (100%) | 0 | 100% |
| Axis Concepts | 3 | 2 | 2 (100%) | 0 | 100% |
| Subha Group | 3 | 2 | 2 (100%) | 0 | 100% |
| Tata Realty | 2 | 2 | 1 (50%) | 1 | 50% |
| Ajmera | 2 | 2 | 1 (50%) | 1 | 50% |
| MJR Group | 3 | 2 | 1 (50%) | 1 | 50% |
| Chaithanya | 2 | 2 | 1 (50%) | 1 | 50% |
| Pride | 12 | 2 | 0 (0%) | 2 | 0% |
| Kns | 5 | 2 | 0 (0%) | 2 | 0% |
| Suyug | 2 | 2 | 0 (0%) | 2 | 0% |
| Trendsquares | 2 | 2 | 0 (0%) | 2 | 0% |
| Nandi | 2 | 2 | 0 (0%) | 2 | 0% |
| Bren Corporation | 2 | 2 | 0 (0%) | 2 | 0% |
Coverage: Karnataka RERA only. Data sourced from RERA QPR portal; refreshed weekly. “Past proposed date” = project crossed its RERA-registered proposed possession date without OC. Does not indicate project failure — many projects have valid RERA extensions. Brickplot does not guarantee accuracy. Always verify on Karnataka RERA portal before making any decision.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does "overdue" mean in RERA QPR data?
In Karnataka RERA, "overdue" means the project has passed its originally registered proposed possession date without receiving Occupancy Certificate (OC). This does not automatically mean the project is abandoned — builders routinely apply for timeline extensions (valid under RERA Section 6). However, a high overdue count indicates a pattern of unrealistic initial timelines, poor planning, or genuine construction delays.
Why is the overdue % so high across all builders?
Across India, RERA data shows most under-construction projects run 1–3 years behind their original RERA-registered date. This is because builders often register optimistic possession dates to attract buyers, then apply for extensions. Our data reflects this industry-wide pattern, not individual builder malfeasance. The relative comparison between builders is more meaningful than the absolute numbers.
How is this data collected?
Brickplot scrapes Quarterly Progress Reports (QPR) from the Karnataka RERA portal weekly. For each project, we extract the latest QPR phase which includes the proposed completion date. If today's date is past the proposed date, the project is marked as "Past proposed date" in our system. Data coverage is currently 146 of 732 Karnataka projects tracked.
Which builders have the best track record?
Based on available RERA QPR data, Sobha Limited and Sattva Group show relatively better on-time rates among large Bangalore builders, though our sample sizes are still limited. NVT (now Mahindra Lifespace) shows the best profile in our data. Note: builders with fewer tracked projects may simply have fewer projects for which we have QPR data — a smaller sample can look better or worse than reality.